Call of Duty: Ghosts
Black ops 2 seems better than ghosts
Cod: ghost seemed like a good game...i thought it was gonna be more than i expected, but its the same thing over and over. I am highly expecting a Black ops 3 to come soon.
Just so sad
I have every COD game but this is the first one I have ever brought back. Ghost is literally nothing more than an attempt at grabbing money . If you enjoy quickscoping and very one sided games then it is for you but if you like competition and a bit of a challenge then do not waste your money. There is a very good reason why GameStop used copy's for cheap. to many have been traded in.
Call of Duty is a good franchise that has an excellent streak of good games. Unfortunately, the streak ends here. Call of Duty Ghosts has a generic campaign, a bad survival defense mode, and a good multiplayer. I would not recommend this to any fan of Call of Duty.
ppl complane about campers. one thing i am a noted camper! an lets just say camping is darn near impossible ! everyone runs and guns, there are no strate lines meanning you actually have to find special campping spots all over the map. not just one place. and many of the maps it is impossible to camp I.e. freefall. squad teaches players even newbies to run with a long auto rifle and your snip snap sniper requires to level up with points befor u can actually use it the perks are all sweet! and really do add to the gameplay ppl say that if i have in cog, off grid, and a silencer im a hacker because i dont show up? really neewbies really ! i love the shear size of this games muti maps they all need certain layouts just to play like one u can snip another shotgun an other mec gun or you would be at a dissavantage
really happy about the fact i actually have to play the game just to unlock the super snipping suits 850!!!!! kills multi player is fast and lag is minimum people who complane need to atleast have a 1 mb/ broad band connection if not spend the 30 bucks an get it...anywhere.
OK to sum up, camping is not easy because the constant changing layouts of maps and size.
Runnung and gunning everyone does it
the only gripe is the ripper, its a mec gun that shoots so strate you can write your name with it
war, never changes.
Now don't get me wrong the game isn't bad it just didn't last very long in my opinion and I would much rather prefer if a frien wer to get black ops 2 because the multiplayer in Ghosts wasn't the best though the campaign was absolutely fenominal. If your the type of person who gets a game fore the campaign get this game NOW!!
Made in a hurry so they could put it in next-gen
This game doesn't feel like they put a lot of work into it. They just wanted to make more money by tricking everyone who bought a Next-Gen Consoles.
good, but could be better
i like cod alright. in fact, it's one of my favorite shooters. but, with ghosts, there was room for improvement. for one thing, they could have done better with extinction. it's alright, but it's a horrible knock off of zombies and survival, but it's not bad, either. for another, they could improve on squad points in multiplayer. maybe make it more like blops, where u had to level up to unlock it, then purchase it. i liked that better because instead of noobs winning every match, good peeps do, because u have to level up to get what u want. in ghosts, though, they are all unlocked, and all u have to do is buy it with squad points. usually, a noob like me would like it like that, but i don't. so over all, it's a good game, but it could be better.
COD 2013 Is A Disappointment
Before I start ranting I just want to put out that i've been playing COD since the release of MW2. If you are like me that have been playing COD for a decent amount of time, then you're going to hate this game, the only people that will like it is the nine year olds that think you're not cool until you play COD. Lets start out with the campaign, the campaigns in COD have been average but Ghost has really stood out to me. It had beautiful graphics, and awesome scenery. The mission's weren't as cliche as previous COD's, but it was still a little just going on a straight part and killing enemies (Most of the times it was 3v100... Cod Logic right there." I liked the concept of america being destroyed, But the campaign is a "extra" part about the game that usually only takes at the minimum 6 hours to complete. Now for the multiplayer, the first thing I just want you to know is you have like only 50% health compared to the previous CODs. At some points Assault Rifles, SMGS, and LMGS do the same thing, kill someone in 2 seconds, it feels nothing like COD: Multiplayer. I felt like the customization with your character and more perks/items to choose from (Pick 10 Class) had great potential (Except the annoying super powered guard dog). But the point that you have very little health and the gun damages feel all the same, the multiplayer was a fail. Now for the last and only thing I played before I sold the game was extinction, and I just LOVED it. It was something different from Spec Ops and zombies, this time they had a third game mode that actually had a story. But it was only fun until you beat the chapter. It maybe takes like an hour to complete, possibly a couple tries. After that its just boring until 2 months later the next DLC comes out. The conclusion of COD: Ghost is the campaign was okay, with a variety missions to do, the multiplayer fails at so many aspects that they changed from previous CODS, and extinction is an awesome fun mode until you actually beat it, and theres no point of replaying it as it will just be boring, my score is 4/10. I still do not know why IGN gave it a 9/10! I honestly think that they were paid to give it that score. Because the game was such a fail, no wonder why this game is 50% off... you are better off playing Black Ops 2, I still find Modern Warfare 2 more fun than BO2 honestly though! Thanks for reading, have a nice day (: <3
Not what COD players like
Maps are WAY too big, guns are not the guns we loved. To earn perks is stupid, squad points. It takes no skill to earn those.
So much potential.
At first I loved the game. No one knew all the exploits of the game and it was actually very fun. After a while the game began to get very annoying. Call of Duty 4 was a great game. You got your skill by playing and experiencing the game. The Call of Duty series over time has made it easier for newcomers and the general population. This was the worst for this due to the several attachments that give a major edge over the old school population. Instead of say a red dot, now you can have a thermal and the equivalent to a red dot in the same attachment. The attachments and the spawns ruined the multiplayer for me. The story line though is the best yet. The game has a very fun and interesting story line that wont let you stop until you beat it. Extinction is fun but very boring after the first few games and gives me a sense that they were trying to hard to compete with zombies. The game has potential but it ruins itself with the poorly thought out gameplay in some manners.