Rated 0 out of 10
by SpawnClown91 I'm happy i get it on 10/29/13!
Battlefield 4 can't wait too play can't wait I'm happy about it!!!. I play battlefield 3 in 2011 i'ts been a long time for battlefield 4 can't wait get it on 10/29/13.
Rated 0 out of 10
by ProphisMusic We Need 64 Player Maps, NO CAMPAIGN, & SP Bots
Battlefield 2 For PC was and remains one of the greatest shooters of all time. Each one since 2142 then has gone straight downhill, especially the console versions. They simply do not capture the epic feeling of a huge battlefield like in BF2 (or even 1942). The single player campaign was just a total waste of space in bf3, and on consoles multiplayer felt small and cramped on any map. Please make BF4 as great as BF2 was, with the option for 64 player battles that can last an hour + , and the commander option so each team has someone directing and making calls. it was so fun, and BF3 had such little replay value it is saddening. You can do it EA, make this one feel like a BATTLEFIELD Again!
Rated 10 out of 10
by JohnnyJedii Best FPS Out There!
In my opinion this as good as a FPS gets. Wide range of guns, huge maps and total destruction everywhere you go! I would highly recommend picking this up.
Rated 9 out of 10 by starwarsfreak Simply Amazing!
To start off, I could not believe how amazing the graphics are on an old generation console (Playstation 3). I was afraid when I ordered Battlefield 4 that the graphics would look horrible. After playing campaign/multiplayer, I was blown away. This is a huge improvement from Battlefield 3 and exceeded my expectations. I already know what your thinking. "Dude, c'mon! There aren't 64 player servers and there's no point playing conquest!" Actually, its not bad having only 24 players. Its balanced out by removing some checkpoints (A,B,C,D,E etc.) Now, on to pros and cons.
> Amazing graphics for an old generation console
>setup is easy
>Multiplayer is a lot of fun
>Multiplayer maps are interesting
>Guns in multiplayer have more attachments and look/sound more realistic
>Campaign is SOOOOO short (6 missions to be exact)
>A few glitches here and there in multiplayer
Overall, I would recommend this game to anyone who loves first-person shooters.
Rated 0 out of 10 by NikeFanForever Already pre-ordered.
For one, I am a big fan of BF3 so there is no reason why I should not get this. But for those who are thinking if you want to get this, think about Frostbite 3. Yes, DICE's new graphics engine that supposedly supports only DirectX 11 on PC will be used on this game. Cinematics look so real already with Frostbite 2 so I can only imagine what a better engine would produce. And rumor has it that besides air and land battle, there will be naval as well like Submarines and such besides what BF3 already has - the raft with mounted LMGs.. Combine all that with their upgraded Destruction 4.0 destruction engine (For those who doesn't understand/not tech savvy, this is the technology they use to be able to "destroy" or "break" something you shoot as how it would shatter in real life. i.e: A small house gets leveled because you shot it with a tank 5 times.) and we will more than likely have one of the most massive destruction action on massive vehicular warfare. You just can't go wrong with Frostbite tech. They just keep getting better and better.
Rated 2 out of 10 by JackBudd Flaws and flaws, disappointing
As a fan of the Battlefield series (console only) since Battlefield 2, this game is disappointing because it has such potential. The first thing I noticed about it; is it was nearly identical to BF3 - it almost seemed like this could be an addon. I had only played one mission of the story and moved on to the multiplayer. Then the game froze. I restarted, went to multiplayer again and got the feel and noticed that my console couldnt seem to keep up with the graphics the game wanted to show me; why the BADWORD make this a PS3/360 game if it was CLEARLY meant for next-gen only?! But whatever graphics arent everything. Then the game froze... And the cycle continued. Now on the gameplay perspective; its a Battlefield game so I really want to love it; get my 240 bravo posted up on an overwatch and lay waste to people - but could not find a way to take out a Littlebird helo, neither could my whole team apparently because the dude went like 40-0... Anyway, vehicles seem unbalanced and classes/weapons seem as though they take too much to progress. Returned.
Rated 5 out of 10 by jmon707 First Impressions after 3 days
The good about this game is the graphics and sounds are great. frostbite 3 is a great engine. I like they actually added something to boats which gives them more power. The interesting thing I will never understand is why change all the controls? What were these guys thinking. I would recommend changing the controls to veteran cause the closest you are going to get to battlefield 3 but is still nothing like it. I mean they need to put out a lot of updates some things I don't understand why they would put it in there. If you get hit by a rocket you are temporarily disabled which gives the attacker and infantry soldier super advantage over just about everything. I understand giving the infantry soldier more power but dang you can't even kill a guy with a 25mm cannon with explosive rounds without at least 2 passes! I think they a bit too far as far giving no power to vehicles and everything to infantry I mean if the vehicles are basically worthless then why not just wait and get call of duty ghosts? This is just a first impression from what I see so far so this might change.
Rated 10 out of 10 by ExoTheElite Battlefield 4 is the Game of the Year
I used to hate Battlefield because if it's blind side of gaming. I was a big Call of Duty gamer, so. Soon after Call of Duty doing the same thing though...we'll of course I got bored of it, and Ghosts just brought it all down for me. I played Battlefield 1942, 1943, 3, and the remarkable, outstanding, innovative, Call of Duty Killer, the one and only Battlefield 4.I played it recently and it proves itself to be the top FPS(First Person Shooter)and puts Call of Duty to its shame. Levolution. That's now my favorite word so far. Anyway...if you disagree with me well, then your a loser. Call of Duty already won "Game of the Decade," but that's not stopping EA, DICE, and Frostbite 3 from bringing down Call of Duty to rubble. Just like the skyscraper falling in Battlefield 4s Siege of Shangia map. Case is closed. DICE...go make Call of The Duty pay for what they did to Vince Zampella.
Rated 10 out of 10 by BF4Lord257 I LOVE This Game!!!!!
I never get tired of this amazing fps game. I play it any time I can and I am never bored by any of the maps or guns. This is one of the best games in history in my opinion, and it will take alot of thinking to ever top this game.
Rated 6 out of 10 by 643RollTribe What were you thinking EA and Dice?!
The game was alright when you star playing it. The graphics look pretty good sometimes but at others i fell BF3 look better. The sound' especially of the guns is awful. IT sounds (and plays like) COD compared to BF3's loud and realistic roar from the muzzle. The sniper rifles have the cool crack of the bullets going by but gets extremely annoying when coming from DMRs.I feel the game has lost some of its class specialties now that carbines and DMRs are all class weapons. Power weapons are annoying and trolling when the player is a support player and can replenish the ammo of the power weapons. THEN there's the bugs. You have people shooting fully automatic assault rifles that HIT AND KILL you in one shot and you don't even hear them fire. There's now a 0% health glitch that people can kill you and run off with no health. And this is just the begining of the glitches and with every patch, it ADDS more.The game LOVES to FREEZE! Battlepacks are terrible, map design is awful. Overall, I'm upset with this after all the hype and excitement for it to be a great game for it to be a glitchy copy and paste of Battlefield 3!