Rated 10 out of 10 by EliteEliminator Dont be fooled by the wannabees.
The facts here are simple. A lot of game companies are jellous of the successy of Modern Warfare franchise and call of duty so they decided to cash in on the winning formula. EA created Battlefield to rip off Modern Warfare and try to get there money. However, Bad Company 1 & 2 were not as good as Modern Warfare 2. Sure, some mistake where made with Black Ops (because treyarch made it and they arent very good) but Modern Warfare 2 is one of the greatest games of our generation.
Alot of people aresaying get Battlefield 3 instead of Modern Warfare because dice created a game with amazing graphics well guess what the amazing graphics wont help if the gameplay sucks and guess what, Modern Warfare 3 will continue the classic tradition of Modern Warfare 2 by deliver a product that is both for fans of war simulations and for people who just wanna have fun.
Dont be fooled by the pretty graphics of the rip off Battlefield 3, pick up the ORIGINAL, the sequel to the greaTest game of the past 5 years, MODERN WARFARE 3!
Rated 4 out of 10 by Mosesk Meh!
Modern warfare 3 was intended to be the greatest successor in the COD series and they did their very best on it. HOWEVER, Infinity Ward Has an issue with trying new things. in a magazine article i read they believed they were better than battlefield and most other shooters because of their FrameRate. Because of this they are afraid to try new animations or sound effects or even some manned vehicles! However i will agree that 60 frames per second is nice, but will not win my vote alone. . This game has a solid control Scheme. rewarding level system, and quick gameplay....... But at its heart that's all it is! just like CODMW2! and this is what happens when you believe FRAMERATE is your key to success (go ahead and look up their obsession with frame-rate) you end up making a game that has no real change and is just like the original........ i choose COD because of its popularity led to becoming a social event, changing weapons and perks were fun, BUT if your just going to spit a 60$ expansion at the people then don't even make a game. ....... im just glad its not another HALO ODST haha........ or is it?
Rated 10 out of 10 by proudlaptopgamer MW3=Most Underrated Laptop game of all time
This game gives us laptop owners 60 frames per second on a full screen resolution. You can't get any more entertainment and multiplayer value than this game if you have a laptop and are being left out by poor frame rates because of excessive details that are pumped into games that have little to no effect on core gameplay, which is what this game is all about not just in terms of low demanding graphics but of features and mechanics that are based on gun on gun experience with little regards to anything else. MW3 doesn't have a lack of mobility (long pauses in sprinting and movement that jeopardize your health) in Black Op games and lack of play-style customization and fast paced action in MW2. If I want to play multiplayer right now and don't want anything that to come in my way, MW3 is the way to go.
Rated 5 out of 10 by Super68 Heh it's ok
Just another mindless shooter, after i complained about BF3 i take it all back. I would have to say that BF3 is probably a better game even though the maps fail. I wasnt impressed with MW3. first of all the sounds are really lame the exposions are stupid. The maps are worst then BF3. I just dont know what all the hype was about. this game is nothing but a run n gun shooter that takes no skill. BF3 is alot more realistic and the sounds a really good and detailed animations even on every bullet hole. I would recommend BF3 instead of buying MW3. Even the single player is boring what happed to the old fashion solo shooters, i hate having to follow team mates in singleplayer. They just dont make shooters the way they use to anymore. remember how epic Medal of Honor Allied Assult was back in the day? it actually took skill to hit with a sniper gun in multiplayer. sigh....
Rated 1 out of 10 by smhcod MW2.?
I bought the game, waste of money. Graphics and game play is equivalent to MW2. When you're aiming at their head, it takes 10 bullets for a head shot (reminds me of Black Ops). Killstreaks are the same as MW2 except for the new ones(which in my opinion are useless). They up'd the levels on claymores, acr, steady aim, scavenger, etc. There are so many open areas, it feels as if im playing Halo. Sadden that after 4 years in the making, the game turned out to be this horrible. I would much rather play BF3 than MW3. If you're a fan of cod as am I and played it, you understand. If not and just play the game because it's new and you're trying to prestige (which is at level 80) and show off, go for it. If Activision is going to release and other MW in the future, change everything!! That's why it's called "New Games" not "Replica Games".
Rated 0 out of 10 by XAbyssus Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3: World War 3?
Okay. So, I've seen the trailer about 83 times (literally) and I got a few things down. First, MW3 is to take place in modern countries. Next, it will be about one man (your character) starting WW3. Now, this fact doesn't seem to be that important. After looking at it, the main goal is not to kill, but to take over. Yes, this means there will be shooting, and lots of new guns for us all. But, this means (for once) your main goal is to repel the enemy. There will be the usual undercover sabotage missions (in which Treyarch has perfected in Black Ops) but the game will not widely include these. The game will have the story mode made made by Infinity Ward, and multiplayer made by so many companies, I don't even know. The gameplay will be more interactive, and will have better graphics. I guess for more we have to wait for E3.
Rated 1 out of 10 by MarineJBond Terrible Game
This game was expected to fail by many people..... and it did not fail those predictions. The rating for Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare was rater a 9.4 on console and computer and all games prior to Call of duty 4 were also rated in the 9 and above range. Everyone game after call of duty 4 has never reached a 9. rating..... in fact.... everygame after call of duty 4 went down in rating for every game released. starting from call of duty 4 and so on the rating goes like this..... Call of duty 4- 9.3 Call of duty World at War- 8.7 Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2- 8.2 Call of Duty Black Ops- 7.5 Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3- 4.5 Call of Duty Black ops 2- 6,5 These are all ratings of pc versions of the game except for World At war. This should be an eye opener for many people who buy or think about buying this game
Rated 0 out of 10 by Kalashnikova47 MW3 or BF3
To be honest I have been a fan of the COD series from the beginning. The series has had it's ups and down's with both developer's but I would have to say that as a hole Black Ops has been the the most complete and balanced of the series. I feel that MW3 will bring the series the credit it so rightly deserves. I loved Battlefield, BC the 1st one cause it was different and funny. I was not a fan of the multiplayer though. I can say the same for the 2nd. The multiplayer is filled with spawn killing, laggy servers and 2 me the vehicles are just way to over powered in some matches. I feel BF3 will have an amazing singleplayer but I still feel that MW3 will be the better complete package in both offline and online gameplay. I guess we will see a couple of weeks after MW3 comes out who will be the better of the 2.
Rated 0 out of 10 by Victory4193 Cod multiplayer Fails
Multiplayer on cod is for little kids no true gamer plays it. All there is to it is pointless run and gun gameplay that takes no skill what so ever. Anyone who is actually good at games will avoid this and go for the best series of shooters of all time Battlefield. Battlefield has been around longer than cod they did wwII first they did modern war first then cod slowly followed. Battlefield is real war style multiplayer where you drive tanks or support your team by flying a heli to extract them or whatever you want where cod has none of that. All environments are destroyable on battlefield so the battle constantly changes as buildings colapse and forests fall. Everything about Battlefield is better it takes real teamwork and any gamer with skill will buy it ocer this garbage.
Rated 0 out of 10 by Jeyrnb Modern Warfare 2.5...
i was all hyped about the news when modern warfare 3 was coming out now that i see trailers multiplayer and other things explained its same thing like modern warefare 2 just diffrent maps should of been released as dlc but i see they made whole game thats full price instead of doing that since its nt latest cod game black ops is for now...this is going to suck im happy i got bf3 very realstic i can fly jets in huge maps team up with friends and do coop,drive boats etc..u name it its all here this game has haters and im not a fanboy i have cod 4,modern warfare 2 and black ops which black ops suckeed but i liked mw2 when it was out so dont wate ur money pickin this up be smart people wait till theres an actual good cod game thats not same