Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3
Modern Warfare 2 DLC
This is the same thing as Modern Warfare 2, only with new guns, maps, kill streaks, game modes. I don't get why people say it's better than Battlefield 3. When Battlefield 3 has BETTER graphics, maps, weapons, game modes, etc.
Why are people going gay for a 36 second video that only show places under attake. battlefield 3 has real gameplay, graphic's are beast and is in iraq fighting real alcida not some fake stuff, thats why bf3 look's a game to get.
Dont be fooled by the wannabees.
The facts here are simple. A lot of game companies are jellous of the successy of Modern Warfare franchise and call of duty so they decided to cash in on the winning formula. EA created Battlefield to rip off Modern Warfare and try to get there money. However, Bad Company 1 & 2 were not as good as Modern Warfare 2. Sure, some mistake where made with Black Ops (because treyarch made it and they arent very good) but Modern Warfare 2 is one of the greatest games of our generation.
Alot of people aresaying get Battlefield 3 instead of Modern Warfare because dice created a game with amazing graphics well guess what the amazing graphics wont help if the gameplay sucks and guess what, Modern Warfare 3 will continue the classic tradition of Modern Warfare 2 by deliver a product that is both for fans of war simulations and for people who just wanna have fun.
Dont be fooled by the pretty graphics of the rip off Battlefield 3, pick up the ORIGINAL, the sequel to the greaTest game of the past 5 years, MODERN WARFARE 3!
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3: World War 3?
Okay. So, I've seen the trailer about 83 times (literally) and I got a few things down. First, MW3 is to take place in modern countries. Next, it will be about one man (your character) starting WW3. Now, this fact doesn't seem to be that important. After looking at it, the main goal is not to kill, but to take over. Yes, this means there will be shooting, and lots of new guns for us all. But, this means (for once) your main goal is to repel the enemy. There will be the usual undercover sabotage missions (in which Treyarch has perfected in Black Ops) but the game will not widely include these. The game will have the story mode made made by Infinity Ward, and multiplayer made by so many companies, I don't even know. The gameplay will be more interactive, and will have better graphics. I guess for more we have to wait for E3.
Modern warfare 3 was intended to be the greatest successor in the COD series and they did their very best on it. HOWEVER, Infinity Ward Has an issue with trying new things. in a magazine article i read they believed they were better than battlefield and most other shooters because of their FrameRate. Because of this they are afraid to try new animations or sound effects or even some manned vehicles! However i will agree that 60 frames per second is nice, but will not win my vote alone. . This game has a solid control Scheme. rewarding level system, and quick gameplay....... But at its heart that's all it is! just like CODMW2! and this is what happens when you believe FRAMERATE is your key to success (go ahead and look up their obsession with frame-rate) you end up making a game that has no real change and is just like the original........ i choose COD because of its popularity led to becoming a social event, changing weapons and perks were fun, BUT if your just going to spit a 60$ expansion at the people then don't even make a game. ....... im just glad its not another HALO ODST haha........ or is it?
Stop the hate!
If you dont like the modern warfare series go play something else. I dont know why everyone is saying that this is just the same trash. I love the cod series and the battlefield series. Even though i like the cod series more i dont go dissing the battlefield series. Really, if you hate something why waste your time looking at it. BTW I CANT WAIT FOR THIS GAME!!!!
We will Wait...We will See
I have played every single Call of Duty Game, yes even Big Red 1. So I have seen the good and the bad. The truth is that IW makes the best call of duty games, yet I don't see their name on the box. Nor do I see Treyarch's merely Activision. Is this the end of the Franchise as we know it? the company climaxe with Call of Duty 4. Even MW2 got lower reviews than that game. However, How can they continue the series. MW2 left us with a cliffhanger, but will it be enough to satiate the thirst of us gamers? What I want to see in this game is a good campaign, Black op's campaign was okay, but not all that fun. Even MW2's campaign was shakey. I want a campaign where the characters are more than idiots who rush out and die, leaving you alone to kill the enemies or rush out, taking bullets and yelling at you to follow them. I also want missions that don't rely on infinite waves of enemies to make it hard (i.e blk ops levels 3 and 5 I believe). In Multiplayer, I like the pace of MW2, the maps are just more comfortable to navigate than Black op's maps. I like the wager matches and currency system of Black op's however. Maybe they could add a couple more gametypes to change it up a bit. Will there be a gametype like Spec Ops or Zombies, where you can play by yourself or with Friends? That would be cool. However, with the diminishing quality of each game, we must ask ourselves if this is going to be the epic blockbuster to shatter CoD 4 and Mw2, or if it will be another lackluster experience like WaW and Black ops. I recommend Waiting a week or two, letting your friends spend their ,omey, so you can try it without buying it, or at least get their opinion before you buy ir
MW3=Most Underrated Laptop game of all time
This game gives us laptop owners 60 frames per second on a full screen resolution. You can't get any more entertainment and multiplayer value than this game if you have a laptop and are being left out by poor frame rates because of excessive details that are pumped into games that have little to no effect on core gameplay, which is what this game is all about not just in terms of low demanding graphics but of features and mechanics that are based on gun on gun experience with little regards to anything else. MW3 doesn't have a lack of mobility (long pauses in sprinting and movement that jeopardize your health) in Black Op games and lack of play-style customization and fast paced action in MW2. If I want to play multiplayer right now and don't want anything that to come in my way, MW3 is the way to go.
I bought the game, waste of money. Graphics and game play is equivalent to MW2. When you're aiming at their head, it takes 10 bullets for a head shot (reminds me of Black Ops). Killstreaks are the same as MW2 except for the new ones(which in my opinion are useless). They up'd the levels on claymores, acr, steady aim, scavenger, etc. There are so many open areas, it feels as if im playing Halo. Sadden that after 4 years in the making, the game turned out to be this horrible. I would much rather play BF3 than MW3. If you're a fan of cod as am I and played it, you understand. If not and just play the game because it's new and you're trying to prestige (which is at level 80) and show off, go for it. If Activision is going to release and other MW in the future, change everything!! That's why it's called "New Games" not "Replica Games".
This game has a short but good campaign. The spec ops mode is like last years and the new survival mode is a very good game mode. The game mode rarely gets old. The multiplayer is like you remember it from last year with new stuff and every now and then youll get lag and die alot but the game is very fun. People dont know how to rate this game. Just because its the same, doesnt mean you have to rate it bad. rate a game on how it plays. This game plays like Mw2 and COD4 which were GOOD GAMES so it DESERVES a GOOD SCORE. go out and buy this game!